All children deserve textbooks,
right? Education is the future of America, right? Equal opportunity, and education is
a fundamental right that many Americans hold dear. The State of New Mexico has a textbookprogram, which is currently being challenged, as a violation of the
Establishment Clause and the state’s Blaine Amendment. The program uses taxpayer funds, around one
million each year, to pay for textbooks and computers for any school that
qualifies, whether it be private, public, secular or non-secular. The program was first created in an effort to
increase the literacy rate in New Mexico.
But when New Mexico became a state, a Blaine Amendment, was created in
an effort to discriminate against the rapidly growing number of Catholic
immigrants moving to the United States.
Many Blaine Amendments exists across the United States because of the
anti-Catholic sentiments that raged across the country. Many anti-religious groups have tried to use
the Blaine Amendment in an effort to prevent any funding, direct or
indirect to be given to religious organization, and in this case private
religious schools in New Mexico. The
state Court of Appeals first dismissed the case, but the State Supreme Court
sided with the parents and ended the funding to over one-hundred private
schools. The New Mexico Association of
Nonpublic Schools appealed the decision, sending the case to the federal high
court.
The lawsuit, first filed in 2012, has
taken a new turn due to the decision of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia vs. Comer.
The New Mexico Supreme Court had previously decided that the public
funds providing aid to the religious schools were a violation of the Blaine
Amendment, but after the Trinity ruling that is up for debate. The Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer decided
that laws which discriminated against religious organizations that would have otherwise
receive funds, had they been secular, were deemed unconstitutional. The court will now have to decide if the
Blaine Amendment is constitutional, sending the case back to the New Mexico
Supreme Court awaiting oral arguments in May.
The Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia
vs. Comer has created a precedent that should make the Blaine Amendments
unconstitutional. The Blaine Amendment,
although facially neutral, is not neutral to non-secular groups. The New Mexico program is also specific in
the allocation of funds. The funds
cannot be used for any religious materials, or resources that can be used to
promote religion. This distinction is
vital to the continuation of the New Mexico textbook school fund and consistent
with the decision in Meek v. Pittenger. Meek v. Pittenger determined that funds could
be used to provide equipment for religious school, as long as there was no
government entanglement with religion. The
other argument for the continuation of the program is the fact that the materials
that were being provided were granting the same “general benefits” that were
available to the public schools. The helps
to create a common educational basis on which the school systems can grow.
The program should be allowed to continue
because, the funds are not being used to promote religion, rather they are
being used to provide the same teaching materials that are offered at secular
schools, and is being used to prevents schools from receiving funds just
because they are religious. The Trinity
Lutheran Church v. Comer also encourages the continuation of the funding
project. The courts cannot prevent
groups from receiving funding based on religion, but I begin to wonder if this
sets a precedent of a slippery slope.
Next private schools will be asking for more and more funding. I do not see an issue with this funding
program because of the regulation of the funds, but it does create
opportunities for more public funds to be available for religious
organizations, as we have seen in the debate over disaster funding available
for religious buildings.
https://www.becketlaw.org/case/new-mexico-associations-nonpublic-schools-v-cathy-moses/
I agree with you and also think a relevant case to your argument is Mitchell v. Helmes. In that case the court clearly allowed for secular material to be given to religiously affiliated schools. Textbooks, unlike teachers (in Lemon v. Kurtzman) can be monitored and screened to ensure that only secular material is gained from them being provided. It can also be argued that there is a relevant state interest in educating youth to the best of their abilities, regardless of their faith.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the same "general benefits" given to public school students should be given private schools. If the state believes, providing funds for secular textbooks improves the general welfare of their citizens then, they have the right to allocate funds to qualifying schools. New Mexico's interest in improving the literacy rates seems to be a compelling reason to provide funding for textbooks to non-public schools. The State is supposed to be neutral to religion, not hostile. Trinity Lutheran shows, denying funds for a qualified nonpublic for secular purposes is considered hostile to religion. I think the line should be drawn at, providing computers to nonpublic schools because the various ways a non-secular school can use computers for further their religious studies such as, religious research and printing religious texts.
ReplyDelete