The clear issue regarding this case is the freedom of religious exercise by Mid Vermont regarding their education and religious beliefs. Is it constitutional to disallow Mid Vermont to participate in athletics and be removed from the Vermont Principal’s Association due to their refusal to participate in a basketball game involving a transgender student? It is important to consider the “free exercise of religion” clause, but also the power of the VPA, and state laws regarding transgender students in sports. First, the VPA removed Mid Vermont based on the association's beliefs and policies regarding discrimination based on gender, not religious beliefs. The VPA, a voluntary association, which is a democratic government according to their website reserves the right to decide who, and who not will be allowed to participate in their association. Therefore, Mid Vermont does not have the ‘right’ to play in the association, but instead the privilege if they meet such criteria and requirements. On the VPA’s website, they write, "VPA member schools agree to abide by final decisions of the VPA”, therefore if a school does not abide by earlier policies that were democratically created, the VPA has the final decision. Finally, in Vermont, state laws allow transgender students to compete in sports under the gender they identify with, and this right was exercised by such students for Long Trail. In conclusion, the salient issue is concurrent with the constitutionality of removing Mid Vermont from the VPA based on grounds of religious discrimination. Was it constitutional to remove Mid Vermont from the VPA after refusing to play Long Trail?
This is a very important, and increasingly prevalent issue in schools nationwide. Considering this case involves the intersecting of religious rights, transgender rights, and constitutional rights, it is hard to decipher the rights that outweigh others. When I was considering this case, I noticed how the concept of neutrality, its impact on children, and why the VPA possibly breached the “free exercise clause”. In my opinion, the VPA is only trying to align itself with state laws regarding transgender students and participation in sports. Additionally, Mid Vermont does not reserve the right to be offended by the participation of transgender students, as it is legal by the state of Vermont.
Most importantly, the VPA reserves its right to sanction who and who is not in the association. As the executive director stated, if Mid Vermont wants to follow their own school’s policies and beliefs, which do not align with the VPA, they are welcome to play in another league. Since the school decided to breach such policies of the VPA, they are no longer a member of the VPA. In my opinion, the removal of Mid Vermont was not based on religious discrimination, as they are claiming to the state. The private school has every right to possess and instill Christian values within their students and community, but simply put, they do not possess the right to be in the VPA. The VPA’s intentions of removing Mid Vermont were not based on their religious beliefs, but rather their breach of their association’s policies, which the school agreed to when joining the VPA.
Sources:
https://vtdigger.org/2023/03/13/vermont-religious-school-that-refused-to-play-team-with-trans-player-banned-from-sporting-events/
https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/youth/sports_participation_bans
https://vpaonline.org/about/bylaws/
5 comments:
Alex -
You developed, in my opinion, an extremely well-written response to a case that involves so many contemporary debates - constitutional rights, free exercise of religion, and transgender rights. Like you emphasized, it can become very hard to decide on a decision when multiple aspects are being considered.
Like you, I agree that the Vermont Principals' Association (VPA), ultimately, has the authority to remove the Mid Vermont Christian School from the league. Upon joining the league, the school had to agree to certain policies, including committing to “racial, gender-fair, and disability awareness." By claiming discrimination against their "religious beliefs" is evidently hypocritical, considering they agreed to the policy initially. Like you said, it is a privilege for the Mid Vermont Christian School to be part of VPA - not a right.
Great post! I think that you provided a great summary of the case and developed a well-formulated personal response.
I agree with your holding. Mid Vermont, under the provisions of the VPA, breached the programs policies. Although Mid Vermont was “offended” as a product of the given circumstances, this does not warrant constitutional action. Although Mid Vermont held their own religious beliefs and may implement them in a school setting, there is no place for these religious beliefs that are actively conflicting with the policies of the VPA.
Overall, this case was super interesting. I’m definitely going to want to know the outcome of this case.
Alex, you did a great job laying out all the facts of this case that involved so many different pieces to the puzzle. I also agree with your stance on the case. Although the private school has the right to enstill their religious beliefs to their students, once they leave school grounds and play against other public schools that is no longer true. It also says in the bylaws of the VPA all schools must follow all rules and guidelines and if they do not they can be kicked out of the league which is the case here. I'm anxious to see what ends up happening to this and what the verdict is.
This was a great post to read. This is very interesting especially since it is so prevalent in society today. In this case, I believe that the Mid Vermont Christian School was being discriminated against as well. This can be taken right from the Bible that they use in their faith daily. It states that God made you in his image. Therefore, they disagree with transgender people because they have changed their image in the likeness of God by changing their gender. Therefore, I think it is unconstitutional to remove the Mid Vermont Christian School because they are denying their First Amendment rights of free exercise of religious beliefs.
Now, in relation to the "racial, gender-fair, and disability awareness" policy, I think they could dive deeper into this because is it actually gender-fair to have a biological male to be playing with biological females just because they are transgender? There are previous instances where biological females are getting hurt from a transgender female. Therefore, is it considered fair to both parties or are they partial to one party than the other.
Alex, this was a great post. The transgender athlete debate is such a hot topic issue and you did an excellent job of simply sticking to the facts of the case. I agree with you that Mid Vermont Christian School was not removed from the conference due to their religious beliefs but because of their failure to follow the VPA’s policies. I believe that the VPA’s policy of committing to “racial, gender-fair, and disability awareness” is neutral as it not only avoids privileging one religion over another but also does not privilege religion over non-religion. It is simply a rule that aligns with Vermont state laws. Additionally, there are alternative conferences that Mid Vermont could participate in. Maybe there is even a nearby conference composed of all religious schools that Mid Vermont could join that would better align with their religious beliefs.
Post a Comment